IAC News

.

February 2009

 

Dear City College faculty staff and administrators,

 

Since last fall we have been focused on facilitating the development of program level student learning outcomes (SLOs) and getting them placed in the catalog.  But, we don’t want you to lose sight of the big picture of the SLO Assessment Cycle.  To this end we are providing you with a brief overview.

 

Ø  NOW and forever: keep documentation of dialog that occurs in the department regarding what they want students to learn and what is most valued by the department. This can be done with department meeting agendas, meeting notes, brainstorming lists or SLOs language that comes out of the meeting.  The new software will provide a place for this too.

Ø  NOW: develop program level student learning outcomes for the catalog by 3/2/09. Remember if you include the outcome it will need to be assessed and data discussed in your department.

Ø  NOW & fall FLEX 2009: develop a plan for when (what semester/year) SLOs will be assessed and in what classes.  This is an assessment plan with mapping to classes so everyone knows where learning takes place for each outcome.  This includes where it is introduced, practiced and assessed.  This is where you create your timeline.  A 3-5 year cycle is reasonable depending on the number you have. 

Ø  Spring & Fall 2009: develop or choose assessment tools and criteria for success for their outcomes.  We have a wonderful new campus researcher that can help-Xi Zhang

Ø  Fall 2009 & spring 2010: use the identified assessment tools.

Ø  Spring FLEX 2010: analyze data.  Don’t forget, Xi can help.

Ø  Spring 2010: use the data to improve student learning by discussing assignments, strategies, curriculum, prerequisites etc.

 

Accreditation agencies expect that the college will have a plan in place so that course, certificate, degree and program level SLOs will be identified and assessed with the data being used for improved student learning.  By 2012 we need to be at a level so that the assessment process is on-going and we have documentation that we are using results for program improvement.

 

Each of our official course outlines contains student learning outcomes or objectives.  Some people spend a lot of time trying to define the differences between these two terms.  But, in the institutional assessment committee here at City we see course objectives and course SLOs as one and the same.  The objectives for each course were developed by extensive faculty dialog.  We see no need to create a new list of what students will learn in each course.

 

What makes an objective an SLO is simply that a means for assessment and criteria for success has been attached to it ( For example 80% of the students in CHIL 151 will obtain at least 3 points out of a 4 point faculty-developed rubric on facilitating conflict resolution with children.)

 

What makes the SLO part of an assessment cycle is that the faculty talk about the assessment data once it is collected via student work; identify strengths and gaps in learning, and use this information to make changes in the program, curriculum or teaching to improve the outcome for students.

 

Remember that SLO assessment isn’t a measure of everything the student is learning. They are specific sets of knowledge, skills, beliefs, and/or abilities that your department has decided to take time to look at based on your values and perspectives.

 

What the accreditation SLO requirements have brought to our campus is increased dialog about our students and how program faculty and staff support learning in the disciplines of our passions.  What could be better?  Ok, lots of things but it’s really pretty rewarding and fun once you start it!

 

Institutional Assessment Committee

 

Building

Last Update: 02/26/2009